Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:14:18 +0100 From: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> To: Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: which label to use in mount? Message-ID: <CAOc73CBJaDqOE5ZUJrZ2U_jjM%2B77sTCRO=631U1SsASQ634Fiw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5678FFE8.4070408@gmail.com> References: <CAFLLzCMQtupZX651wR35vrJdXY5Ber8qKPd%2B5EX4Dkp4iCv=vg@mail.gmail.com> <5675574E.3060501@gmail.com> <5678FFE8.4070408@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015, Sergei G <sergeig.public@gmail.com> wrote: > I think I just found the reason for different reported numbers: > > df -h > /dev/gpt/dback 48G 2.6G 42G 6% /backup > > vs > > df -H > /dev/gpt/dback 52G 2.8G 45G 6% /backup > Nice - that old trick! So do you think you were sometimes typing -h and other times typing -H? Or do you think there is a bug that df reports with different base 1000/1024 for gpt vs ufs labels? Regards, Ben -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOc73CBJaDqOE5ZUJrZ2U_jjM%2B77sTCRO=631U1SsASQ634Fiw>