Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 20:51:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Steve Sizemore <steve@cmpharm.ucsf.edu>, alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which version to run Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903172050080.47099-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <62436.921664740@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > install, I had to use a 4.0 snapshot. However, I'd really rather > > track stable (since that's what I use on my intel machines), if that > > is possible. Is 3.1 stable really stable for the alpha platform, or > > do I need to use current? > > It might be better to track -current just for a little while, > at least until 3.1-stable catches up for the alpha. I don't > think it's actually diverged all that much at all; Doug? The main difference is that -current uses the new portable syscons. I do intend to merge that over at some point but I can't predict when. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9903172050080.47099-100000>