Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:59:21 +0100 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linuxolator: utimes implementation Message-ID: <20061215095921.GA96603@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0612141858x3a0a4ce5vc348d32d9b56f343@mail.gmail.com> References: <790a9fff0612140333ofd0891el59f767329f291371@mail.gmail.com> <20061214153029.GA36558@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <790a9fff0612141858x3a0a4ce5vc348d32d9b56f343@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 08:58:15PM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On 12/14/06, Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 05:33:40AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote: > >> While I was running the the tests for ltp-full-20061121, I noticed > >> that the utimes function wasn't implemented in the linuxolator. > >> > >> I looked up the man page and found that it was similar to the utime > >> function, except that it allows a program to set an inode down to the > >> microsecond. > >> > >> Merging together the linux_utime and freebsd32_utimes functions, I was > >> able to create the linux_utimes function. > > > >what about this patch instead (only relevant part): > > > I'm able to compile the linux module with this patch, and I no longer > see "* utimes not implemented" when running the ltp testcases. > > The attached patch to ltp-20061121 implements testcases for utimes > (based on the utime testcases). It currently is failing the utimes04, > and utimes05 testcases: can you please tell me where can I get the sources of those two tests? I fail to see it.. thnx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061215095921.GA96603>