Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:04:40 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: gnome@ is swamped in @freebsd robot noise, deterring human activity. Message-ID: <201506171504.t5HF4e4C038694@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:33:49 %2B0800." <CAOc73CAEAArZeAf%2Bxke4FutwcZmTLjhp7pvGQgHJs7KWC_NPTQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:33:49 +0800 > To: FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org > Subject: Update editors/abiword > The maintainer timeout has long since passed, and I have not been able to > get any feedback from freebsd-gnome@. gnome@freebsd feedback is unlikely, it's dieing from @freebsd robot noise ! http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2015-May/author.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2015-June/author.html robots are: bugzilla-noreply pkg-fallout portscout linimon (aka broken ports robot) real mails from humans are rare! 2 in May, 5 in June so far. + spam. Compare traffic with 10 years back: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2005-June/author.html Lots of humans used gnome@ to co-operate back then. Robot owners should reduce frequency of robot excretions, which swamp gnome@, contravening list definition: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome This is a forum for discussions related to bring the GNOME environment to FreeBSD. This is not cc'd to: gnome@ so usual balance of traffic in archive remains. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Indent previous with "> ". Reply Below as a play script. Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, HTML, or base64.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201506171504.t5HF4e4C038694>