Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:54:09 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: benh@jpj.net Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Aironet, Ethereal and raw 802.11 frames Message-ID: <200109051754.f85Hs9q18281@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10109051340180.8821-100000@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:44:46 -0400 (EDT) >From: Ben Hockenhull <benh@jpj.net> >> Doug Ambrisko's patches to do this may be found at >> http://www.ambrisko.com/doug/an/. However, they are based on a -STABLE >> that is a few weeks old, and some of the patches may not apply cleanly. >Ah ha! That does indeed explain it. :-) >I just now tried Doug's patches and they did not all apply cleanly, so >if you could generate a patchset based on today's -STABLE, I'll cvsup and >apply those patches. OK; see http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/an-stable.patch. At this point, I'm not going to try to separate out the "RF monitor" patches from the those to the Linuxulator that will allow the use of the Cisco-supplied Linux-based tools. >Are there plans to integrate these changes into -CURRENT or -STABLE at >some point? There's certainly a significant amount of hope. :-) Some of us are trying to help get this done, yes. I've been running with different versions of the patches for several months. Cheers, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109051754.f85Hs9q18281>