Date: Sun, 30 May 1999 19:27:51 +1200 From: Joe Abley <jabley@clear.co.nz> To: kip@lyris.com Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Forrest Aldrich <forrie@forrie.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, jabley@clear.co.nz Subject: Re: Pcmcia support Message-ID: <19990530192751.B51029@clear.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.05.9905292349030.22722-100000@luna>; from kip@lyris.com on Sat, May 29, 1999 at 11:59:35PM -0700 References: <35774.928047146@zippy.cdrom.com> <Pine.SOL.4.05.9905292349030.22722-100000@luna>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 11:59:35PM -0700, kip@lyris.com wrote: > That is the kind of response I like. I don't appreciate being flamed for a > reasonable question about something that is not documented in an obvious > place. Check the archives for freebsd-current, freebsd-hackers and freebsd-mobile. They're easy to find from www.freebsd.org, and contain numerous extensive threads with all the details. If you _do_ look for these, you will easily see how (a) the apparently hostile responses you got were, in fact, quite mild and (b) why nobody is eager to start another discussion on the subject. I think the correct way of asking "why doesn't someone roll PAO into current" is "I have taken aspect X of APM/PCMCIA/whatever support from PAO, and tidied it up for CURRENT -- the patch is attached, please test". Joe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990530192751.B51029>