Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Aug 2003 02:42:20 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        bsd@perimeter.co.za
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: /usr/ports/lang/ruby
Message-ID:  <20030808094220.GA98568@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <courier.3F336F17.00000B91@perimeter.co.za>
References:  <courier.3F3364AF.000004AB@perimeter.co.za> <20030808091546.GA98440@rot13.obsecurity.org> <courier.3F336F17.00000B91@perimeter.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:36:23AM +0200, bsd@perimeter.co.za wrote:

> OK, looking at /usr/ports/MOVED, I see a number of ruby* pieces have been=
=20
> moved.=20
>=20
> Is there an easy/correct method to use to migrate to a moved/renamed port=
. =20
> And I'm curious about dependencies.  For example, portupgrade's own versi=
on=20
> has not changed, and 'pkg_info -r portupgrade*' still shows=20
> ruby-1.6.8.2003.04.19 as required.=20

Yes, as it should.  The port has not been upgraded, it has only moved
location.  The next time it is upgraded, portupgrade will follow the
entry in the MOVED file to the new location, and everything will
continue to be just fine :)

Kris
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/M3B7Wry0BWjoQKURAudPAKCEy1QEnL+xqsmGIF7dD0zaU9wHGACdEulX
IRO3nPOvTncvZ08Zb5xI6Z4=
=OMKN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030808094220.GA98568>