Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:10:07 +0200
From:      Dancho Penev <dpenev@mail.bg>
To:        Wiroth Didier <didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: mount_ntfs fails
Message-ID:  <20030223091007.GA613@earth.dpsca.bg>
In-Reply-To: <web-723951@mcesr.etat.lu>
References:  <20030221131503.GA84412@catflap.home.slightlystrange.org> <web-723951@mcesr.etat.lu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:26:02PM +0100, Wiroth Didier wrote:
>From: "Wiroth Didier" <didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu>
>Subject: Re: mount_ntfs fails
>To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 14:26:02 +0100
>
>On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:15:03 +0000
> Daniel Bye <dan@slightlystrange.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:54:57PM +0100, Didier Wiroth
>> wrote:
>> > Hey, 
>> > 
>> > I have two harddisks:
>> > 1) ad0 with 1 slice containing Windows XP pro
>> > 2) ad2 with two slices s1 is ntfs and s2 is freebsd
>> 4.7-release
>> > 
>> > I can mount_ntfs without problems ad2s1 from freebsd!
>> > 
>> > BUT I can't mount_ntfs ad0s! When I try to mount it
>> with the following
>> > command:
>> > mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt
>> > 
>> > I get the following error:
>> > mount_ntfs: /dev/ad0s1: Invalid argument
>> > 
>> > And in /var/log/messages I see this:
>> > Feb 21 13:46:39 lucifer /kernel: ad0s1: slice extends
>> beyond end of
>> > disk: truncating from 78140097 to 4408785 sectors
>> > Feb 21 13:46:39 lucifer /kernel: ntfs_loadntnode: BREAD
>> FAILED
>> > Feb 21 13:46:39 lucifer /kernel: ntfs_vget: CAN'T LOAD
>> ATTRIBUTES FOR
>> > INO: 0
>> > 
>> > 1) What is the problem with ad0?
>> > 2) What can I do to resolve the problem so that I'm
>> able to mount_ntfs
>> > ad0s1?
>> 
>> Does "mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1c /mnt" work?  I have had
>> similar moments of
>> darkness, and seem to recall that was one way out.  I'm
>> not sure of the
>> reason for this - it is something to do with the way
>> Windows installs itself
>> on the disk, and with the BSD disk name convention, the c
>> partition
>> represents the whole slice.  That's my theory, anyway
>>  ;-)
>Nope, does not work :-(
>Any other ideas are welcome! :-))

Yet another idea ;-)

Did you change first disk from basic to dynamic with WinXP?
The dynamic disks in XP world uses different way to store information 
for slices and are incompatible with mbr.

>Thanks anyway!
>Didier
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

-- 
Regards,
Dancho Penev

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030223091007.GA613>