Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 08:25:02 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, jbryant@tfs.net, dkelly@HiWAAY.net, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? Message-ID: <1075.876842702@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Oct 1997 10:03:53 CDT." <Pine.A41.3.95.971014095646.16712C-100000@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Now the B2, on the other hand - that may indeed be a bomber who's > > primary mission no longer justifies its cost. Better to do today's > > job with smaller, less expensive units. > > No longer ??? Victory in Vietnam !!!...Oh that wouldn't happen again ? I was actually talking about low-level nuclear strikes on Russia, which is what the B2 was designed for. Vietnam? I think you're a bit behind the times. There was this "cold war" thing which followed it and dictated a lot of american strategic thinking. :-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1075.876842702>