Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:24:29 +0200 (CEST)
From:      "Raymond Wiker" <raymond@orion.no>
To:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Linux not FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <14182.17917.921115.728733@foobar.orion.no>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990615140756.479A-100000@ws3.double-barrel.be>
References:  <025d01beb725$37acd860$380051c2@qmpgmc.ac.uk> <Pine.LNX.3.96.990615140756.479A-100000@ws3.double-barrel.be>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael C. Vergallen writes:
 > On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Greg Quinlan wrote:
 > > But why Linux and not FreeBSD also?
 > Because FreeBSD dous not have the volume of users Linux apparently has.
 > Now to be serious it does not realy matter because Linux Binaries run
 > under FreeBSD so the apps from SCO should run on FreeBSD anyway.

	Not *all* applications run under the Linux emulation. Two
notable exceptions are the "free" versions of Allegro Common Lisp and
Harlequin Lispworks. This is (almost) sufficient reason for me to
install Linux on one of my machines...

	Is there a mailing list/forum for discussing the Linux
emulation under FreeBSD?

	//Raymond.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14182.17917.921115.728733>