Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:53:35 -0300 (ARST)
From:      "Fernando P. Schapachnik" <fpscha@localhost.schapachnik.com.ar>
To:        njs3@doc.ic.ac.uk (Niall Smart)
Cc:        ncb05@uow.edu.au, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: non-executable stack?
Message-ID:  <199806251653.NAA00182@localhost.schapachnik.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <E0yoqEs-0002io-00@oak67.doc.ic.ac.uk> from Niall Smart at "Jun 24, 98 03:09:30 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
En un mensaje anterior Niall Smart escribi¢:
> be to only turn it on for set[ug]id executables.  There are a number
> of other "features" like this that would be useful, for example the
> ability to specify that only printable ascii characters can appear in
> the arguments or environment of a process before it can exec another.

Don't forget about "international" users. We consider strings like 
"compa¤¡a" perfectly valid ;-)

Regards!

Fernando P. Schapachnik
fpscha@schapachnik.com.ar


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806251653.NAA00182>