Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 08:00:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> To: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de, brian@Awfulhak.org Cc: brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org, Doug@gorean.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca Subject: Re: bin/18900: patch to add colorizing feature to /bin/ls Message-ID: <200005311200.IAA29719@lakes.dignus.com> In-Reply-To: <20000531095153.A80830@curry.mchp.siemens.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > And even with the thing getting committed, he still would not get > colors unless he ran 'ls -G' on FreeBSD. I never would like to act > 'ls' as 'ls -G' as default (as Linux obviously does). > Just as a question then... If the user who wanted colorized ls has to change to get it; why bother with putting this in the FreeBSD ls? I mean, there is a colorized ls port - right? So, you could simply install that one. Then, since the user has to change anyway - have him change to use the installed port... - Just a thought - - Dave R. - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005311200.IAA29719>