Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 22:50:53 +0900 From: Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: n@nectar.com Cc: tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pw_class in _pw_passwd is null if __hashpw() is not called in prior Message-ID: <200009281350.WAA23538@bunko> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sun, 24 Sep 2000 10:08:12 -0500" <20000924100812.A23848@spawn.nectar.com> References: <20000906151431.A26152@hamlet.nectar.com> <14798.4853.288090.72159A@silver.carrots.uucp.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <20000924100812.A23848@spawn.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 10:08:12 -0500, "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> said: n> changing them now. Unless objections come up, I'll commit this change n> or something similar with the next nsswitch commit. Here is another possible trouble. While libc.so.4 with nsswitch no longer requires the magic '+' entry, libc.so.3 and earlier still require '+'. What we need before 5.0-RELEASE meets the world is a tool to find binaries linked against libc.so.3 and earlier, and give a warning. It would also be helpful for us to (semi-)automatically update old binaries installed by ports. (I have been trying this for a couple of days) -- Seigo Tanimura <tanimura@r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <tanimura@FreeBSD.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009281350.WAA23538>