Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 00:31:00 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: A G F Keahan <ak@freenet.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Optimal UFS parameters Message-ID: <20001207003100.J16205@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <59294.976177481@critter>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 09:24:41AM %2B0100 References: <20001207001715.I16205@fw.wintelcom.net> <59294.976177481@critter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> [001207 00:25] wrote: > In message <20001207001715.I16205@fw.wintelcom.net>, Alfred Perlstein writes: > > >> Right now I tend to use: > >> > >> -b 16384 -f 4096 -c 159 > > > >I know you're pretty busy, but any chance of getting this into > >sysinstall? Maybe hindged on the size of the partition? > > sysinstall supports you changing the args to newfs, it has for > a long time. The default lives in the options screen. I know that, I meant making it automagically scale as Matt suggested. I'd do it, but I don't really have a grasp on the optimal parameters to set based on FS size. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001207003100.J16205>