Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:33:40 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <TrimYourCc@NUXI.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The Project and onward [was: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_output.c] Message-ID: <20010312103340.A15895@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010312043409.A86273@mollari.cthul.hu>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:34:09AM -0800 References: <20010312104538.B45619@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <200103121021.LAA87908@info.iet.unipi.it> <20010312125534.B46529@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20010312043409.A86273@mollari.cthul.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:34:09AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > - We definately lack architectural guidance, things keep getting
> > added and added, but were do we draw the line?
>
> What is wrong with the existing situation where architectural
> decisions are made by the FreeBSD developer community? Can you define
> your complaint better?
Decisions != guidance. A lot of the arch decisions made by the community
are specific (or myopic). The type of audience Jeroen is talking about
is a "big picture" few -- one which knows and has taken into account all
the various pockets of FreeBSD large development going on.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010312103340.A15895>