Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:10:34 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/make Makefile Message-ID: <20010315141033.C50446@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010315150231.B362@elvis.mu.org>; from billf@mu.org on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 03:02:31PM -0600 References: <200103151033.f2FAX1q89921@freefall.freebsd.org> <200103151656.f2FGuF923193@harmony.village.org> <20010315150231.B362@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 03:02:31PM -0600, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 09:56:15AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > : remove the concept of a 'maintainer' of our make. there really
> > : isn't a need for any one committer to hold an exclusive lock or
> > : serve as a filter for this code.
> >
> > MAINTAINTER isn't an exclusive lock.
>
> No, but it can be used to assert one (see previous discussions re:
> vinum, isp, etc).
And where did Will try to do this over make that prompted you to do this?
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010315141033.C50446>