Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
To:        Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: VM Corruption - stumped, anyone have any ideas? 
Message-ID:  <200109250027.f8P0RRk97980@earth.backplane.com>
References:   <200109250048.aa97220@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:In message <200109242322.f8ONMaT97469@earth.backplane.com>, Matt Dillon writes:
:>
:>    Hmm.  Do we have a guard page at the base of the per process kernel
:>    stack?
:
:As I understand it, no. In RELENG_4 there are UPAGES (== 2 on i386)
:pages of per-process kernel state at p->p_addr. The stack grows
:down from the top, and struct user (sys/user.h) sits at the bottom.
:According to the comment in the definition of struct user, only
:the first three items in struct user are valid in normal running
:conditions:

    Ok.  I'm going to add a magic number to the end of the process
    structure and check it in mi_switch() in -stable.
		
						-Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109250027.f8P0RRk97980>