Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 20:51:13 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Will Andrews <will@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security Makefile ports/security/labrea Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/security/labrea/files patch-Makefile Message-ID: <20011219205113.D82898@citusc17.usc.edu> In-Reply-To: <200112190822.fBJ8MkE86981@freefall.freebsd.org>; from will@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:22:45AM -0800 References: <200112190822.fBJ8MkE86981@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:22:45AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote: > will 2001/12/19 00:22:45 PST >=20 > Modified files: > security Makefile=20 > Added files: > security/labrea Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr=20 > pkg-plist=20 > security/labrea/files patch-Makefile=20 > Log: > Add labrea 2.3, a defense mechanism against CodeRed. Does this really belong in the ports collection? I still get the occasional CodeRed hit on my webservers, but they're definitely in decline, and unless (until :) there are future vulnerabilities in the same IIS files this doesn't seem to have much utility. Kris --n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8IW5AWry0BWjoQKURAv+FAJ0ZRpU9yBf2/L3UVtHHZkJK1MCR1gCeL4Pe 0P+f7kSLZw3MD2rn1V1QaXA= =sgdS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n2Pv11Ogg/Ox8ay5-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011219205113.D82898>