Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 22:51:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Oliver Fromme <olli@secnetix.de> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: named rejecting all kinds of serials Message-ID: <200209282051.g8SKp8mV097314@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <20020928151840.GV30361@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> wrote: > # olli@secnetix.de / 2002-09-28 15:48:00 +0200: > > Bye the way, RFC 1912 is definitely recommended reading for > > anybody who operates a name server or who is responsible > > for zone files. > > Heh, RFC 1912 (and the others) are definitely recommended reading > for anybody who operates the BIND name server, No, I disagree, it is recommended reading for everone who operates name service, no matter if it's BIND or Microsoft Domain Wizard or whatever it might be called. Large parts of the RFC are not BIND-specific, including the handling of serial numbers, which is the topic of this thread. > Your advice was actually very much to the point, Janine obviously > runs BIND. I just find it hilarious that RFCs are a viable way of > documenting an implementation (as opposed to a principle). BIND is the reference implementation of DNS, and I guess it is the most complete and correct one. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "All that we see or seem is just a dream within a dream" (E. A. Poe) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209282051.g8SKp8mV097314>