Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:40:37 +0200 From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Bryan Liesner <bleez@comcast.net> Cc: Thomas Quinot <thomas@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM) Message-ID: <20030917114036.GA72243@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20030917070959.L458@gravy.homeunix.net> References: <1062861719.2761.35.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030916132228.GG52463@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <1063763321.776.2.camel@guillaume.multiweb.ca> <20030917091350.GA59292@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <20030917070959.L458@gravy.homeunix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 2003-09-17, Bryan Liesner écrivait :
> The patch seems to work, my cd0 and cd1 lines in the dmesg now report
> 33.000 MB/s insetad of 3.300 MB/s.
OK, good, so that's one half of the problem resolved. Now, can you test
whether the actual performances are improved or still slow?
Thomas.
--
Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030917114036.GA72243>