Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 22 Nov 2003 19:55:19 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        bde@zeta.org.au
Cc:        kientzle@acm.org
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked
Message-ID:  <20031122.195519.127506801.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031123131536.M3946@gamplex.bde.org>
References:  <20031123112720.J3301@gamplex.bde.org> <20031122.184733.32325352.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031123131536.M3946@gamplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20031123131536.M3946@gamplex.bde.org>
            Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> writes:
: > Mine is better because it has a more representative slice of currently
: > used terminal types.  Maybe we should replace termcap.small with mine
: > (maybe with the copyright notice).
: 
: I agree.  termcap.small is amazingly uncurrent.  However, perhaps some
: merging and reducing is in order.  Why is a full cons25 or vt2xx needed?
: vi only needs a few capabilities.  I think we mostly use copies of large
: termcap entries because copying the whole things is easier.

You have a good point.  My termcap was done so that we could run a
number of applications...

Grepping seems unsatisfying to find out which keys are used.  Do you
have a list?

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031122.195519.127506801.imp>