Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:20:04 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/i386/net htonl.S ntohl.S Message-ID: <20041020202004.GM73767@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <200410201553.40823.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <4175B591.4090407@elischer.org> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0410192052490.13335-100000@sea.ntplx.net> <20041020190502.GA33840@dragon.nuxi.com> <200410201553.40823.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--JJMoBJ7VTrzwkVuk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 03:53:40PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: +> For 6.0 we are (finally!) going to just drop 80386 altogether. I've bee= n=20 +> wanting to do this personally since early SMPng days, but we came to an= =20 +> agreement back then and since we've already gone and branched RELENG_5 a= nd=20 +> frozen the ABI I think we should stick to the previously agreed-upon pla= n. So maybe it is good time to think about 486 in 6.x. I don't know how much can we get from dropping support for 486, but maybe it's worth it. Before the next war will start, the good argument for me is, that FreeBSD 5.x is still going to work on 486 and we should move on. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd@FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --JJMoBJ7VTrzwkVuk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBdsh0ForvXbEpPzQRAvhuAKCndnIw8KONsO9iwM1QoTZdCg7+JACfb6Wf sbkK2FTpsYZa3+OztRCgYsY= =62Vy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JJMoBJ7VTrzwkVuk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041020202004.GM73767>