Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:36:17 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 Message-ID: <200411021736.21034.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1147794.2EmFa64baP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 02 November 2004 16:20, Kris Kennaway wrote: > (there are at least 350 ports that emit warnings about aliasing, and would > probably have runtime errors when compiled with -O2; moreover, a number of > ports fail to even build with -O2). =20 Out of curiosity, are those ports like to have equivalents in Gentoo's=20 "portage" system? Those guys love to build with -O310 -fomit-instructions= =20 but their stuff seems to pretty much work. Why do we seem to have so many= =20 problems with (presumably?) the same software on our system? IANA compiler designer so I don't really understand a lot of the technical= =20 details, but is this something that can be reasonably understood by=20 somewhat experienced application programmers? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1147794.2EmFa64baP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBBiBn05sRg+Y0CpvERAo+EAJ99EijGJOh32vAiRjTNGLhMquAeKwCgnuIs SYyF9X8feFDN4Qj/3G8IibE= =4w3P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1147794.2EmFa64baP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411021736.21034.kirk>