Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:43:09 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org, Thierry Herbelot <thierry@herbelot.com> Subject: Re: Mbuf double-free guilty party detection patch Message-ID: <20050626064309.GA4700@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050626012002.H935@odysseus.silby.com> References: <20050624212729.C537@odysseus.silby.com> <20050625133052.GA23599@peter.osted.lan> <1437.64.215.82.94.1119717536.squirrel@webmail2.pair.com> <20050625173217.GA24306@peter.osted.lan> <20050625171206.S935@odysseus.silby.com> <20050626021729.GA1991@nagual.pp.ru> <20050626012002.H935@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:20:47AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > Yes and no. Your results tell me that it's probably not a simple use > after free, but rather something smashing all over memory for some reason. It sounds nasty, but I observe no strange behaviour of TCP connections at all for a long time. I have a lots of them actively running sshd, sendmail, popper, ftpd, bind, httpd and cvsupd servers. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050626064309.GA4700>