Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:13:49 +0200
From:      Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, dandee@volny.cz
Subject:   Re: -current kernel can't be complied for 3 days
Message-ID:  <20050723211349.269cd3b7.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
In-Reply-To: <20050723.130438.81409618.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <200507200149.52721.max@love2party.net> <20050720114331.868A64E704@pipa.profix.cz> <20050722191337.269d965b.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20050723.130438.81409618.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote:

> Chances are you are running out of memory.  Can you try the build w/o
> -jN?  Large values of N can easily run a body out of swap space,
> yeilding a build failure when the tree is perfectly fine.
> 
> Persoanally, I never do a -j larger then 4 or 8.  top shows that the
> system that I have is giant bound when I do, so why add more people to
> the list of Giant waiters?

Hi Warner,

I don't think that i ran out of memory. At least swapper didn't sayed
sth. like that. Back in Dec 2001 I even had a -j100 running (for fun) and
it build successfully. This was on a dual PII 333 with 320MB of memoty
compiling a 4.XX on a 4.XX.
Why shouldn't a -j16 on a dual PIII 850 with 640MB of memory compiling a
6.0 on a 5.4 doesn't work then? I know there are many differences between
4.X and 5.X but why got it worse?
A -j4 worked btw (at least the one time I tried it)

-- 
 Oliver Lehmann
  http://www.pofo.de/
  http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050723211349.269cd3b7.lehmann>