Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 21:13:10 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org, Bj?rn K?nig <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> Subject: Re: Adding k9 and k10 to bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <20070829191310.GA50909@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <a31046fc0708291203s3e71d603ka7b34cc320a8166a@mail.gmail.com> References: <-3502020561049594852@unknownmsgid> <a31046fc0708291203s3e71d603ka7b34cc320a8166a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:03:30PM +0400, pluknet wrote: > On 29/08/2007, Bj?rn K?nig <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > what do you think about adding the CPU types "k9" and "k10"? These > > processors have support for SSE3 and I noticed up to 15% faster execution > > of CPU-intensive programs (e.g. graphics/povray) that have been compiled > > using -march=athlon-mp -msse3. > > > > Regards > > Bj?rn > > > > there will be no k9. k10 (Barcelona) is successor of k8 and expected > to launch late in Q4 of this year(2007). I dont think the name matters THAT MUCH, the important thing is to support the newer CPUs with FreeBSD infrastructure... name it "blahblah" if you wish my 2 cents roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070829191310.GA50909>