Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 07:21:57 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysctl text definitions. Message-ID: <20080126152157.GS99258@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <86lk6cpqjc.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <20080124221936.GS99258@elvis.mu.org> <868x2d51wl.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080125192944.GC99258@elvis.mu.org> <86lk6cpqjc.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> [080126 07:10] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> writes: > > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > >> des@ds4 ~% sysctl -d dev.cpu.0.temperature > >> dev.cpu.0.temperature: Current temperature in degC > > lolwhat? When did that get implemented? > > Twice, actually, in 1999 by myself and in 2001 by Luigi. > > > I recall a huge storm of protest when the definitions were included in > > the kernel compile file... > > That was the first time, and completely unjustified as there was a knob > to disable it (the argument was that it would bloat picobsd). o i c. :) > > BTW, when are you going to join the 21st century and get a MUA that > groks UTF-8? :) Civil people use the eighth bit for parity or parody, but nothing else. -- - Alfred Perlstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080126152157.GS99258>