Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:17:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Tuc at T-B-O-H <ml@t-b-o-h.net> To: nlandys@gmail.com (Nerius Landys) Cc: Joachim Rosenfeld <joerosenfeld@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: massive ports update Message-ID: <200806062217.m56MHgKV019665@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> In-Reply-To: <560f92640806061458k7b413e9du49c84c252b424fcb@mail.gmail.com> from "Nerius Landys" at Jun 06, 2008 02:58:19 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In UPDATING it says : Given the scope and sheer number of dependent ports, it may be more advisable to simply blow away all existing install ports (after keeping any local configuration changes), and rebuilding from scratch. I'm wondering just how many ports the author of that statement has. I have a few to say the least. Actually a few hundred. Ok, well, 1102 to be a bit more specific.... Blow away and re-install 1102 ports? For real? Tuc > > Maybe it's because gettext got updated and it's required to rebuild all > ports that depend on it? See /usr/ports/UPDATING. Really I'm just guessing > here. > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Joachim Rosenfeld <joerosenfeld@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Why did ~5k ports change in the last 24 hours? > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200806062217.m56MHgKV019665>