Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:18:07 +1000
From:      Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: rc improvements (wanted?)
Message-ID:  <20080718071806.GV62764@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080718083725.97823be0tg13fn6s@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <200807172056.08835.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <487FCA89.2010308@FreeBSD.org> <20080718083725.97823be0tg13fn6s@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--LQFJYnjHKDAbJRTQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2008-Jul-18 08:37:25 +0200, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net=
> wrote:
>Are you aware that the parallel starting in Solaris 10 reduced the =20
>booting time by a nice percentage?

Given that Solaris boots in geologic time, this probably wouldn't
be difficult.

> If yes, do you expect that FreeBSD =20
>behaves significantly different or do you "just" want to see numbers?

Parallel starting is not guaranteed to be an improvement.  Starting a
whole pile of processes that are I/O bound during initialisation
(think squid or some databases) may be worse than starting them one
at a time.  Likewise, a whole pile of processes that are CPU bound
will just thrash the scheduler.  (Though parallel starting of I/O and
CPU bound processes should be a win).

>Sidenote: Even if there's no significant speedup, the possibility to =20
>start things in parallel should be provided, this would allow more =20
>experimentation (at all respectively later).

Agreed.

--=20
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.

--LQFJYnjHKDAbJRTQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiAQ64ACgkQ/opHv/APuIcxYgCfQfaalhQt85CKO7e38VAL7OT0
zt8AnRBVrZEo4+OK6+P2wwvOvxrlGG4g
=Ih8d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LQFJYnjHKDAbJRTQ--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080718071806.GV62764>