Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:06:15 -0900 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org> Subject: Re: jail init, but another question Message-ID: <200901251706.15683.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <20090125113516.GB33731@screwed.box> References: <20090125113516.GB33731@screwed.box>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 25 January 2009 02:35:16 Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I always try to set up the devfs ruleset in rc.conf. So my question is
> about this in /etc/defaults/rc.conf: ===
> #jail_example_devfs_ruleset="ruleset_name" # devfs ruleset to apply to
> jail ===
>
> It appears not to work in /etc/rc.conf without this rc.subr patch:
> ===
> $ diff -u /etc/rc.subr /usr/src/etc/rc.subr
> --- /etc/rc.subr 2008-07-20 19:26:20.000000000 +0500
> +++ /usr/src/etc/rc.subr 2008-05-12 12:29:03.000000000 +0500
> @@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@
> devfs_set_ruleset()
> {
> local devdir rs _me
> - [ -n "$1" ] && eval rs=\$1 || rs=
> + [ -n "$1" ] && eval rs=\$$1 || rs=
> [ -n "$2" ] && devdir="-m "$2"" || devdir=
> _me="devfs_set_ruleset"
> ===
>
> And, by far the "ruleset_name" does not work in favour of ruleset number.
your patch broke it. eval rs=\$1 means rs will be set to the literal $1, while
it should expand to the ruleset number, using the ruleset name, because
devfs_rulesets_from_file sets:
eval $rulename=\$rulenum
Something else is wrong. Set rc_debug="YES" in /etc/rc.conf then
/etc/rc.d/jail start example
to trace how the rulesets are evaluated.
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200901251706.15683.fbsd.questions>