Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:55:19 +0200 From: David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com> To: Peter Harrison <peter.piggybox@virgin.net> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lenovo S10(e) ACPI Message-ID: <200906231655.23010.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090622192034.GA1059@ideapad.piggybox> References: <200906181407.11607.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <200906211400.19033.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <20090622192034.GA1059@ideapad.piggybox>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2109565.Y3gttBW5YO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 22 June 2009 21:20:34 Peter Harrison wrote: > > David > > Hi David, > > Thanks for coming back to me - I haven't had a chance to test the new pat= ch > yet, but will get on to it as soon as I can. > > Is just a kernel rebuild enough after patching? Last time a did kernel += =20 > world to pick up the last security advisory too and it was a bit painful > (even slower than my old Celeron M based Dell laptop). If you don't have ACPI compiled into the kernel then only that module needs= to=20 be rebuilt, otherwise only the kernel needs to be rebuilt. =20 > I'm still reeling from a packaged based upgrade of Firefox (still took a > while, even using packages). > > Thanks again for your help. I'll be away for the next 3 weeks so can only help you after that. =20 Good luck, David --nextPart2109565.Y3gttBW5YO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkpA7NoACgkQUaaFgP9pFrJ+3gCfQSQO7XZHGx/XzJwuiv/nS75z svoAn2vMCy65VwKl6MdYEuh5bCAyfuH1 =dSxO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2109565.Y3gttBW5YO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200906231655.23010.naylor.b.david>