Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:27:57 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Dima Panov <fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso Message-ID: <20110104162757.GT34314@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <289781294155870@web149.yandex.ru> References: <201101041437.08402.david@vizion2000.net> <4D233619.1000305@DataIX.net> <289781294155870@web149.yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! Dima Panov write: > jhell@dataix.net wrote: > > Replace libiodbc with unixODBC > > > > They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. > Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, > exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? So a drive to replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 10 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110104162757.GT34314>