Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:39:24 -0800
From:      Chip Camden <sterling@camdensoftware.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Backtick versus $()
Message-ID:  <20110224223924.GF1983@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110224221057.GA13262@guilt.hydra>
References:  <loom.20110224T210222-768@post.gmane.org> <AANLkTinQ4MMwWq77k1t-SwqE%2BzPep6VCNS9AKdT_H08b@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20110224T214917-136@post.gmane.org> <AANLkTik88V5Bb2BWM0Kpv3rWfek9_%2BgjqmEt6UbsVjpS@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20110224T220407-811@post.gmane.org> <AANLkTikAB--0Hrw76cbdzgfmeJMPt_N7isaw%2Byn_-QMn@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1102242135020.1945@herc.mirbsd.org> <20110224213322.GA13089@guilt.hydra> <loom.20110224T225518-308@post.gmane.org> <20110224221057.GA13262@guilt.hydra>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NQTVMVnDVuULnIzU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 24 February 2011:

<snip>

>=20
> What we have not yet determined is:
>=20
> 1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh?
>=20
> --=20
> Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

Though I dislike the OP's dismissal of backticks, I must admit that I
would prefer that the standard shell be at least Bourne-compatible.  I
use csh for root for all the reasons that you shouldn't change your root
shell.  I suppose I could change root to /bin/sh, but that doesn't even
have command recall.  I don't know how many times I've keyed in a nicely
composed off-the-cuff conditional only to have it fall flat.  I have to
remind myself to start zsh first when working as root, or start getting
used to using toor instead, or just always use sudo.

--=20
Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F
http://chipsquips.com  | http://camdensoftware.com   | http://chipstips.com

--NQTVMVnDVuULnIzU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNZt4cAAoJEIpckszW26+R5qUH/2bzPu9Gq4i9Mv95f7ULIkEN
1AY2atmBu79uH8Co1DY7ofxcWpTRh0TW5eY5NCyBRAtKxA+7MS5T9qMJMSkS3OJz
NzW9E2xiamGALmRxjvVBAZlMwsBuQJiaALsroRgzB37kb9KlJZPE7uUVYeJoSLYl
N+H6SH0W91paNJ7XeLwuyS46IR6IP2X157XlntmINMrASp0fr3/809+jJh2dSMGq
3O1qySpiupw5wwyVMqBFoe9A8FkO3GXXHYfOB7v4i6g71lH/T0BB0xfMghHlC0GG
oMQYgZpvvlIUmCXMdTX16LWSAF29R0Jy6Pvy1c41swyNK0LgSm2PjQPW7DvvuTs=
=bPXi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NQTVMVnDVuULnIzU--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110224223924.GF1983>