Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:18:30 +0100 From: "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, Stas Timokhin <devel@stasyan.com>, ade@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtool issues Message-ID: <20110620091828.GA16267@curry.linta.de> In-Reply-To: <4DFEE295.3090204@missouri.edu> References: <4DFEE295.3090204@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Stephen, > Or one could instead modify devel/libtools, maybe something like this. > Rename bin/libtool to libexec/libtool.sh, and then rewrite the libtool > script as something like: > > #!/bin/sh > PREFIX=/usr/local > TEMPCCDIR=`mktemp -d -t /tmp` > export PATH=${WRKDIR}:$PATH > ${LN} -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${CC} ${TEMPCCDIR}/cc > ${LN} -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${CXX} ${TEMPCCDIR}/c++ > ${PREFIX}/libexec/libtool.sh $@ > rm -r ${TEMPCCDIR} besides the obvious point that ${TMPCCDIR} should be under ${WRKDIR}, I'm getting nervous reading ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${CC} which seems to assume that ${CC} is the name of a binary to be found in ${LOCALBASE}/bin; this might well be if libtool is used in conjunction with USE_GCC -- but are you sure that this will always be the case? devel/libtool does not have such a dependency, and if using ccache (as I do on my machines) you get something like /usr/ports/devel/libtool>make -V CC /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc /usr/ports/devel/libtool> Am I missing something which makes your suggested changes to devel/libtool still save? Best, Klaus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110620091828.GA16267>