Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:20:06 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erich@alogt.com> To: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@1command.com> Cc: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BETA4: fortune -o gone? Message-ID: <20131205152006.27766c1f@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <020c58348f43c35da047761d0be6a9f4.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> References: <20131205090208.4cdba36b@X220.ovitrap.com> <20131205010722.GE44739@glenbarber.us> <020c58348f43c35da047761d0be6a9f4.authenticated@ultimatedns.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
i, On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:58:41 -0800 (PST) "Chris H" <bsd-lists@1command.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:02:08AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >> I think that since I installed BETA1 the 'offensive' fortunes are > >> gone? I did a fresh install with a BETA1 CD and upgraded recently > >> to BETA4. > >> > > > > Yes, they were (finally) removed with extreme prejudice. > > Nobody likes a good BikeShed. But _really_? > Is FreeBSD going "PC" (Politically Correct)? > Looks like a sign of weakness. :( a sign? It is a weakness. FreeBSD did not force anybody to use fortune with the -o option. It was also possible to delete the 'offensive' files. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131205152006.27766c1f>