Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 15:12:06 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: davidg@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c Message-ID: <25863.840147126@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 15 Aug 1996 15:02:23 PDT." <199608152202.PAA26974@austin.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Are we still supposed to be maintaining RELENG_2_1_0? I thought that > ended when 2.1.5 came out. Just asking -- either way is fine with me. The concensus seems to be that we'll use it as a "support branch" up until the point where some variant of 2.2 is stable enough to upgrade to, then it truly will fade away. I don't expect to be doing any more releases along that branch, mind you, but there's no reason not to throw the folks who are still following it the occasional bone. Speaking of which, what do folks think about shutting down sup access to -stable and forcing a move towards CTM and CVSup for -stablefolk? It's *very* wasteful to have all those supfilesrv process's scanning the entire source tree for what are, at most, a couple of changes a week, not to mention the overhead of cvs updating the checked out version of -stable for sup on freefall. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25863.840147126>