Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:59:42 -0500
From:      Maxim Khitrov <mkhitrov@gmail.com>
To:        Peggy Wilkins <enlil65@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 8.0-RELEASE and "dangerously dedicated" disks
Message-ID:  <26ddd1750912010459weda306esbb81d7a2b7025b6e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1789c2360911280928t1e6e7b06p707abc1131f82bef@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1789c2360911280928t1e6e7b06p707abc1131f82bef@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Peggy Wilkins <enlil65@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone elaborate on what exactly this statement in the 8.0
> detailed release notes means?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#FS
>
>> 2.2.5 File Systems
>>
>> =E2=80=9Cdangerously dedicated=E2=80=9D mode for the UFS file system is =
no longer supported.
>>
>> =C2=A0Important: Such disks will need to be reformatted to work with thi=
s release.
>
> Due to history I won't go into, all my production (currently
> 7.2-RELEASE) systems are installed onto "dangerously dedicated" disks.
> =C2=A0What exactly do I need to do to upgrade them to 8.0? =C2=A0(I'm not=
 asking
> for an upgrade procedure, I'm familiar with that, but rather, how this
> change impacts the upgrade.) =C2=A0I think that the suggestion that the
> disks need to be reformatted is extreme and I hope something less
> extreme will suffice.
>
> Also, just to be clear, does this statement refer to boot disks, data
> disks, or both?
>
> It doesn't make sense to me that "dangerously dedicated" could have an
> impact on UFS filesystems specifically. =C2=A0A partition table is just a
> partition table, regardless of what filesystems might be written on
> disks, yes? =C2=A0Am I misunderstanding something here?
>
> Thanks for helping to clear up my confusion...
>
> plw

Peggy,

Were you able to find an answer for this? I also have a number of
servers and firewalls that use dangerously dedicated disks (boot and
data). I don't see why UFS would care if it's mounted from ad1a vs.
ad1s1a.

- Max



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26ddd1750912010459weda306esbb81d7a2b7025b6e>