Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Jan 2011 01:44:30 +1000
From:      Dima Panov <fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru>
To:        J. Hellenthal <jhell@dataix.net>
Cc:        David Southwell <david@vizion2000.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso
Message-ID:  <289781294155870@web149.yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <4D233619.1000305@DataIX.net>
References:  <201101041437.08402.david@vizion2000.net> <4D233619.1000305@DataIX.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello!

05.01.2011, 01:00, "J. Hellenthal" <jhell@DataIX.net>:
> On 01/04/2011 09:37, David Southwell wrote:
>
>> šHi
>>
>> špkg_libchk shows that diablo-jdk misses libodbcinst.so:
>>
>> šdiablo-jdk-1.6.0.07.02_12: /usr/local/diablo-
>> šjdk1.6.0/jre/lib/amd64/libJdbcOdbc.so misses libodbcinst.so
>>
>> šIs it right that libodbcinst.so is installed by unixODBC-2.3.0_1 ?
>>
>> šWhen attempting to install databases/libodbc++ š(includes unixODBC) which
>> šwould presumably fix this issue I receive the console report:
>>
>> šunixODBC-2.3.0_1 conflicts with installed package(s):
>> šššššššlibiodbc-3.52.7
>> šššššššvirtuoso-6.1.2_1
>>
>> šI need virtuoso on this system.
>>
>> šHow do I preceed?
>
> Replace libiodbc with unixODBC
>
> They provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC.
>

Nope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, exist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso.


-- 
Dima Panov (fluffy@FreeBSD.org)
KDE@FreeBSD team

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=100000181104157



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?289781294155870>