Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 19 May 2000 00:38:34 -0600
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Chuck Paterson <cp@bsdi.com>, Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: A new api for asynchronous task execution
Message-ID:  <3924E16A.B1123749@softweyr.com>
References:  <200005190529.WAA06634@mass.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Smith wrote:
> 
> > >         If you are talking about running processes in
> > > order based on scheduling priority, this is propagated
> > > though mutexs which have been blocked on.
> >
> > No, speaking of temporarily elevating the priority of a process holding
> > a lock to the highest priority of all processes blocking on the lock.
> 
> You could call this "priority lending" so that the rest of us understand
> what you're talking about.  8)

The only system I've ever worked on that implements them refer to
them as inversion-safe or inversion-proof semaphores.  I've never seen
another name, including "priority lending", in any literature or
article on the subject.

-- 
            "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                         Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com                                           http://softweyr.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3924E16A.B1123749>