Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:48:10 -0500 From: Mikel King <mikel@ocsinternet.com> To: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org> Cc: Adam Laurie <adam@algroup.co.uk>, Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/rc.firewall fixes Message-ID: <3A9526AA.19D00D47@ocsinternet.com> References: <200102202005.f1KK5kv83619@medusa.kfu.com> <3A93A9CC.BC1D39FB@algroup.co.uk> <3A93C2FB.3E160997@ocsinternet.com> <3A94AE05.965BC5E4@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
rc.conf.local and rc.local weree deprecated around the release of 4.x. Of course you can still use them if you really want...but I think rc.conf is a better choice since it's already skagged into rc.firewall and it keeps everything centralized. Cheers, Mikel Doug Barton wrote: > Mikel King wrote: > > > > Yes I would tend to agree that it would be rather handy to have the config > > outside of the rc.firewall, and rc.conf is a likely candidate. Presently do > > this manually because I use have several scripts that use these common vars > > like 'oif' and for maintenance purposes it's easier to have a central point > > for their assignment. > > What's wrong with /etc/rc.conf.local ? > > Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A9526AA.19D00D47>