Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:55:55 -0500 From: Raoul Schroeder <memphis_ms@gmx.net> To: Helge Oldach <helge.oldach@atosorigin.com>, FreeBSD stable <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: sendmail 8.12.2 MFC'ed Message-ID: <3CA1F99B.9030009@gmx.net> References: <200203262226.XAA27664@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >Because they don't ...stay unused. It's just convenient to have a >standard, well- and widely-known piece of software around. You may not >like it but both Sendmail and BIND are the de facto standards. Period. > Isn't that an argument that Microsoft normally uses..? *ducks* I don't mind sendmail being the default, what I do mind is that after every upgrade I need to find the new sendmail binary, delete it, and point a link towards the qmail sendmail binary. If all stayed in the same place, then there would be no problem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CA1F99B.9030009>