Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:26:03 +0100
From:      Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net>
To:        Tony Jago <tony@convoitec.com>
Cc:        Alec Kloss <alec@setfilepointer.com>, "<freebsd-afs@freebsd.org>" <freebsd-afs@freebsd.org>, "Jason C. Wells" <jcw@highperformance.net>, Derrick Brashear <shadow@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: OpenAFS port [was: OpenAFS on FreeBSD Progress (Works)]
Message-ID:  <42451957-717C-4CA3-97D9-E2ACABE55E34@pingpong.net>
In-Reply-To: <A22DDF0293864B03AD8FE957D5EB5316@valentine>
References:  <493ACAC4.5020806@linuxbox.com> <12501719@bb.ipt.ru> <493D898C.1030609@linuxbox.com> <22B6C509EF7C4AB0A2D8350C31BB8D5D@valentine> <57098597@bb.ipt.ru> <26695644@bb.ipt.ru> <DC87E29101195307B372C4F5@c-3157e155.1521-1-64736c12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se> <20081213004251.GA88954@keira.kiwi-computer.com> <db6e3f110812121706i2b022e0bh3ff7413086c73dc1@mail.gmail.com> <A22DDF0293864B03AD8FE957D5EB5316@valentine>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As long as nothing conflicts with arla, I also suggest an all in one  
installation. Keeps it simple, which is always important.

Palle


13 dec 2008 kl. 03.27 skrev "Tony Jago" <tony@convoitec.com>:

> I think that we probably don't need more then one port. Yes, I know  
> I was the one what originally proposed the meta port but I have  
> changed my mind :) The reason we had a server and a client port  
> originally was that the server was the only bit working and the  
> kernel model was set not to compile. The client was was arla client.  
> Now that both the openafs server and client are supported by the  
> openafs team I can see no reason why it shouldn't be all in one  
> port. The port should have separate rc variable to allow the  
> administrator to only start the client or the server if they choose  
> to. openafs_client_enable="YES" and openafs_server_enable="YES" for  
> example. This gets around all the conflicting file problems. The  
> kernel module need only be loaded if the client is required. This  
> would seem to be a much easier and cleaner solution.
>
> My 2 cents,
>
> Tony



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42451957-717C-4CA3-97D9-E2ACABE55E34>