Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:18:01 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Johan Bucht <bucht@acc.umu.se>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New libc malloc patch Message-ID: <439D2429.7040808@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20051212055804.GA18100@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <b41c75520512031245q48521143m@mail.gmail.com> <7318D807-9086-4817-A40B-50D6960880FB@canonware.com> <b41c75520512040451t360eb01u@mail.gmail.com> <12CA5E15-D006-441D-A24C-1BCD1A69D740@canonware.com> <439CC5DA.3080103@elischer.org> <439CC939.5080703@freebsd.org> <20051212012907.GA13640@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051212043023.GA16678@xor.obsecurity.org> <439D04CF.1000204@acc.umu.se> <439D10F9.6060004@freebsd.org> <20051212055804.GA18100@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:56:09PM +0800, David Xu wrote: > >>Johan Bucht wrote: >> >>>Those times seems way too high even for a serial allocator, is >>>libpthread performance really this bad on amd64 or is it broken? >>> >> >>Not sure which thread library has been tested. > > > The quoted text referred to libpthread, the default on amd64. > > Kris May try libthr too ? :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?439D2429.7040808>