Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:33:41 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: trix@basement.net Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: bacula-server-1.38.5_1 rc scripts Message-ID: <43DF9F75.8020801@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <43DF7CAF.2000501@basement.net> References: <43DD0997.3422.3D6D968C@dan.langille.org> <43DDE3CB.23838.6E6C5F@dan.langille.org> <43DF7CAF.2000501@basement.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Trix Farrar wrote:
> There are actually an embarrassing number of options;
>
> Of course, there are the "normal" enable options; bacula_fd_enable,
> bacula_sd_enable and bacula_dir_enable. The scripts are written so that
> , I believe, they should run on NetBSD as well using bacula_fd,
> bacula_sd, and bacula_dir respectively.
Sorry I'm coming late to this thread, but it sounds like you've put a lot of
good work into this port, and the update to rc.d style scripts, thanks for
that. :) Just one question, I assume from what you've written here that you
have 3 separate rc.d scripts for these 3 separate services, is that correct?
If so, thanks, as that is the way to handle a situation like you described
(if I am understanding it correctly).
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43DF9F75.8020801>