Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:12:54 +0200 From: "pobox@verysmall.org" <pobox@verysmall.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs Message-ID: <4538F586.20705@verysmall.org> In-Reply-To: <20061020142207.GA6298@gothmog.pc> References: <4538B2AF.3080006@verysmall.org> <20061020142207.GA6298@gothmog.pc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > You're wrong. It's the other way around: > > We are *forced* to use CVSup, because CVS is centralized, without > any other good way to mirror changesets to a distributed network of > mirrors, users and developer workspaces. > > On the other hand, SVN is centralized too :-) What I wanted to say is that FreeBSD will remain for the time being, on cvs - is that correct? May be it was a complicated way to ask.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4538F586.20705>