Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:22:15 +0400
From:      "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
To:        Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SATA and PATA drives are mutually exclusive
Message-ID:  <47032707.2050804@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <bef9a7920710022211i6f6cc57ei6e5b43acad50f42b@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <bef9a7920710022211i6f6cc57ei6e5b43acad50f42b@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
> On my machine (P35 ICH9 some sort of AMI bios [OEM version number
> makes no sense]) the BIOS will see both SATA/300 and PATA (UDMA 133)
> drives installed at the same time but FreeBSD 7-Current (AMD64) only
> sees the SATA drive.   Sorry I do not have more data because FreeBSD
> makes no mention what ever of the PATA drive.  Hardware details:
> 
> MSI Neo-F Mobo (ICH9, AMI BIOS, 7 SATA and 1 PATA connectors)
> 4 GB RAM
> E6850 CPU (compiled as HAMMER not NOCONA in kernel)
> 500 GB SATA Drive
> 250 GB PATA Drive (I want to install upto 2)

Can you show your verbose dmesg.boot.

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47032707.2050804>