Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:47:17 -0500 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Da Rock <freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxul build hit the roof! Message-ID: <4D1CB795.5090506@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4D1BBE7F.5060202@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D1B044F.6050903@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <86fwtgob5w.fsf@gmail.com> <4D1BBE7F.5060202@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/29/2010 18:04, Da Rock wrote: > I got it worked out in the end, but it still took 2G+ memory to build; > so my suggestion is a warning to EU in the make process that this could > take a lot of memory to build, and some suggestions as to how to prevent > or workaround the problem so they don't go whining on the list about it > being broken. Turning off OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS for 'libxul, firefox* & thunderbird*' ports would have stopped all this swapping from happening. Is there a specific reason why you changed it from its defaults ? is there really anything to gain ? in respect to 'libxul'... Regards, - -- jhell,v -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNHLeVAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+PKcIAIa7GY1eR9QP1hd2PL/LRrXa sBmqHmCjThOzPDB7NL49EP7VHMDnKI9UPyTM41OmM3r7utdMQHNLb7DJT/qlayeg +Mkv4LnFrWVbOVO0Hby38ABkMO25HHhJDvbk0G4l+B0Fa1W5WOaAqCncoIRQZ7dS bgj5Ju9xrMjh3kf34qNfSI12mRbyob0v72sC7Z1UZbMn8GJXmPUyCKxogrA6lcAW Y26KeJl8N+Y7wLG20yGwAl28xwCQ4P2kvg0YwvffRm+OIGmWj8rqZiEbKzPL1RMb j7BF9+g0JA0TiKp4rr5wwO8ioNFacQz2WJ6Uy3mPw1xo/ivKsrNVzcqO4plwl9Q= =2UTN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D1CB795.5090506>