Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 08:33:33 +1000 From: Da Rock <freebsd-hackers@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64bit build errors Message-ID: <4EDFE9BD.9020105@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4EDFE933.3060708@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4EDEB600.9000102@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <CAFHbX1KT6AoPPWY6%2BbYbqyVy6CXTfZsMUwjLRfKBMdOSDoXw9A@mail.gmail.com> <4EDF4703.1050705@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <CAFHbX1JuZPgsKCwVO5eRPm6jPk29tSANbGj82gz2eVDP1=abcQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EDF5253.5060201@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <CAFHbX1%2BRmnzA-0W2KxAC8L=n3EEtnXp7ytsgt2ZMENMmG7gvEw@mail.gmail.com> <20111207114756.48295690@mikmeyer-vm-fedora> <4EDFE933.3060708@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/08/11 08:31, Da Rock wrote: > On 12/08/11 05:47, Mike Meyer wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 12:17:57 +0000 >> Tom Evans<tevans.uk@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> The way I understand it is that they use compiler/assembler features >>> that did not exist in the version of binutils that is in base. >> Which begs the question - why isn't the new version of the tools >> (provided by ports) listed in BUILDDEPENDS in the port, then? >> > I'm not building the port. This is my own build, so the builddepends > isn't existent. Hence hackers@, else I would have posted ports@
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EDFE9BD.9020105>