Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 19:54:15 -0400 From: Quartz <quartz@sneakertech.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: check variable content size in sh script Message-ID: <519814A7.8070702@sneakertech.com> In-Reply-To: <20130518180634.9e5fd3c2.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <5194F65F.6080503@a1poweruser.com> <5194FB0A.9090400@tundraware.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201F4D41F@ltcfiswmsgmb26> <5197998E.6050200@sneakertech.com> <51979A8B.8080703@tundraware.com> <5197A526.7020302@sneakertech.com> <20130518180634.9e5fd3c2.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>#foo works with sh Is it actually part of the official spec though is what I'm wondering, or is it a case of other shells not rejecting 'advanced' statements when running in emulation. > At least FreeBSD's implementation of sh (which is ash, I think) > supports the # functionality. The reason I say all this is that my copy of tcsh (on this not-freebsd machine) *doesn't* work with this when in sh emulation. ______________________________________ it has a certain smooth-brained appeal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?519814A7.8070702>