Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:50:03 -0700 From: trafdev <trafdev@mail.ru> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT: strange kernel balancer behaviour Message-ID: <51EE198B.7040509@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon-WdsUnH33smkf%2B33yrUHP0p-Fp3ng1ZyTsvLb9tQfVA@mail.gmail.com> References: <51E0E2AF.7090404@mail.ru> <CAMOc5cz6gP2N62T4QhbTdVar94O4FSdPDsqktD_9vJ0mYVqt_Q@mail.gmail.com> <51E44E2F.8060700@mail.ru> <CAJ-VmomHHfhExa4g63tT_sf0hTPa2T7jPKQGHrD0fchq=-k%2B=g@mail.gmail.com> <51E455D5.2090403@mail.ru> <20130722200205.GO26412@funkthat.com> <51EDA37A.9040200@mail.ru> <CAJ-Vmon-WdsUnH33smkf%2B33yrUHP0p-Fp3ng1ZyTsvLb9tQfVA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
yep, FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p3 On Mon Jul 22 21:05:55 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 22 July 2013 14:26, trafdev <trafdev@mail.ru> wrote: >> Actually overhead is almost zero, the real problem is in non-equivalent load >> distribution between processes. >> As https://lwn.net/Articles/542629/ mentions - >> "At Google, they have seen a factor-of-three difference between the thread >> accepting the most connections and the thread accepting the fewest >> connections;" >> I'm getting almost same results > > On FreeBSD? > > > -adrian > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51EE198B.7040509>